lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2162334bdf4d635f1414ffef52378c0f423366a7.camel@perches.com>
Date:   Mon, 15 Feb 2021 10:11:03 -0800
From:   Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:     Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        Dwaipayan Ray <dwaipayanray1@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, lukas.bulwahn@...il.com,
        linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v3 2/3] docs: add documentation for checkpatch

On Sun, 2021-02-14 at 12:15 +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 13, 2021 at 06:45:12PM +0530, Dwaipayan Ray wrote:
> > +Checkpatch (scripts/checkpatch.pl) is a perl script which checks for trivial style
> 
> It's quite amusing that this patch contains lines > 80 columns.

Then you could amuse yourself further by looking at the existing
line lengths of .rst files.

$ git ls-files -- '*.rst' | \
  xargs cat | \
  awk '{print length($0);}' | \
  sort -n | \
  uniq -c | \
  tail -20
      2 226
      1 230
      1 233
      1 234
     48 246
      1 253
      2 257
      1 263
      1 270
      1 275
      1 276
      1 293
      1 294
      1 308
      2 324
      1 359
      1 360
      5 369
      1 370
      2 409

Other than testing whether or not an SPDX license line exists,
checkpatch doesn't inspect .rst files.

There are better tools for that.


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ