[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+CK2bA7Xz0Zg5phsQi3mhnp+_PHLAAGRLgFTQNw1FjBHaXsHA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2021 14:30:14 -0500
From: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
Cc: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@...ux.microsoft.com>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] arm64: mm: correct the inside linear map
boundaries during hotplug check
> Can't we simply use signed arithmetic here? This expression works fine
> if the quantities are all interpreted as s64 instead of u64
I was thinking about that, but I do not like the idea of using sign
arithmetics for physical addresses. Also, I am worried that someone in
the future will unknowingly change it to unsigns or to phys_addr_t. It
is safer to have start explicitly set to 0 in case of wrap.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists