[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YCt/N9LkJT1VJEW1@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2021 09:15:51 +0100
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
To: Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, mingo@...hat.com,
bp@...en8.de, x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, luto@...nel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, paulmck@...nel.org,
mchehab+huawei@...nel.org, pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>, oneukum@...e.com,
anshuman.khandual@....com, jroedel@...e.de,
Mina Almasry <almasrymina@...gle.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>,
"Song Bao Hua (Barry Song)" <song.bao.hua@...ilicon.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也)
<naoya.horiguchi@....com>,
Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@...cle.com>,
Xiongchun duan <duanxiongchun@...edance.com>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [External] Re: [PATCH v15 4/8] mm: hugetlb: alloc the vmemmap
pages associated with each HugeTLB page
On Tue 16-02-21 12:34:41, Muchun Song wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 3:39 AM Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com> wrote:
[...]
> > > Using GFP_KERNEL will also use the current task cpuset to allocate
> > > memory. Do we have an interface to ignore current task cpuset?If not,
> > > WQ may be the only option and it also will not limit the context of
> > > put_page. Right?
> >
> > Well, GFP_KERNEL is constrained to the task cpuset only if the said
> > cpuset is hardwalled IIRC. But I do not see why this is a problem.
>
> I mean that if there are more than one node in the system,
> but the current task cpuset only allows one node.
How would that cpuset get a huge pages from a node which is not part of
the cpuset? Well, that would be possible if the cpuset was dynamic but I
am not sure that such a configuration would be very sensible along with
hardwall setup.
> If current
> node has no memory and other nodes have enough memory.
> We can fail to allocate vmemmap pages. But actually it is
> suitable to allocate vmemmap pages from other nodes.
> Right?
Falling back to a different node would be very suboptimal because then
you would have vmemmap back by remote pages. We do not want that.
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists