[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <871rdg8dyb.fsf@jogness.linutronix.de>
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2021 12:17:24 +0106
From: John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Cc: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@...gen.mpg.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, x86@...nel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, it+linux-x86@...gen.mpg.de,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
Subject: Re: smpboot: CPU numbers printed as warning
On 2021-02-16, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> wrote:
>> Also you should add '\n' into the previous string to make the behavior
>> clear. It will always be printed on a new line when pr_info()
>> is used.
>
> This was made to use pr_cont() on purpose so that the output is
> compact,
It is supported to provide loglevels for CONT messages. The loglevel is
then only used if the append fails:
pr_cont(KERN_INFO "message part");
I don't know if we want to go down that path. But it is supported.
John Ogness
Powered by blists - more mailing lists