linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 04/33] vfs: Export rw_verify

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1429650.1613476535@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date:   Tue, 16 Feb 2021 11:55:35 +0000
From:   David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc:     dhowells@...hat.com, Trond Myklebust <trondmy@...merspace.com>,
        Anna Schumaker <anna.schumaker@...app.com>,
        Steve French <sfrench@...ba.org>,
        Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@...ewreck.org>,
        Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-cachefs@...hat.com, linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org,
        ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org, v9fs-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>,
        David Wysochanski <dwysocha@...hat.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/33] vfs: Export rw_verify_area() for use by cachefiles

Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de> wrote:

> > Export rw_verify_area() for so that cachefiles can use it before issuing
> > call_read_iter() and call_write_iter() to effect async DIO operations
> > against the cache.  This is analogous to aio_read() and aio_write().
> 
> I don't think this is the right thing to do.  Instead of calling
> into ->read_iter / ->write_iter directly this should be using helpers.
> 
> What prevents you from using vfs_iocb_iter_read and
> vfs_iocb_iter_write which seem the right level of abstraction for this?

I don't think they existed when I wrote this code.  Should aio use that too,
btw?  I modelled my code on aio_read() and aio_write().

But I can certainly switch to using vfs_iocb_iter_read/write, though the
trivial checks are redundant.  The fsnotify call, I guess I'm missing though
(and is that missing in aio_read/write() also?).

David