[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5039f6178715dc4725a8c7f071dfd9ef5d70ae43.camel@infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2021 15:10:21 +0000
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
"shenkai (D)" <shenkai8@...wei.com>,
"Schander, Johanna 'Mimoja' Amelie" <mimoja@...zon.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
hewenliang4@...wei.com, hushiyuan@...wei.com,
luolongjun@...wei.com, hejingxian <hejingxian@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] use x86 cpu park to speedup smp_init in kexec situation
On Tue, 2021-02-16 at 13:53 +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
> I threw it into my tree at
> https://git.infradead.org/users/dwmw2/linux.git/shortlog/refs/heads/parallel
>
> It seems to work fairly nicely. The parallel SIPI seems to win be about
> a third of the bringup time on my 28-thread Haswell box. This is at the
> penultimate commit of the above branch:
>
> [ 0.307590] smp: Bringing up secondary CPUs ...
> [ 0.307826] x86: Booting SMP configuration:
> [ 0.307830] .... node #0, CPUs: #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 #8 #9 #10 #11 #12 #13 #14
> [ 0.376677] MDS CPU bug present and SMT on, data leak possible. See https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/admin-guide/hw-vuln/mds.html for more details.
> [ 0.377177] #15 #16 #17 #18 #19 #20 #21 #22 #23 #24 #25 #26 #27
> [ 0.402323] Brought CPUs online in 246691584 cycles
> [ 0.402323] smp: Brought up 1 node, 28 CPUs
>
> ... and this is the tip of the branch:
>
> [ 0.308332] smp: Bringing up secondary CPUs ...<dwmw2_gone>
> [ 0.308569] x86: Booting SMP configuration:
> [ 0.308572] .... node #0, CPUs: #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 #8 #9 #10 #11 #12 #13 #14 #15 #16 #17 #18 #19 #20 #21 #22 #23 #24 #25 #26 #27
> [ 0.321120] Brought 28 CPUs to x86/cpu:kick in 34828752 cycles
> [ 0.366663] MDS CPU bug present and SMT on, data leak possible. See https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/admin-guide/hw-vuln/mds.html for more details.
> [ 0.368749] Brought CPUs online in 124913032 cycles
> [ 0.368749] smp: Brought up 1 node, 28 CPUs
> [ 0.368749] smpboot: Max logical packages: 1
> [ 0.368749] smpboot: Total of 28 processors activated (145259.85 BogoMIPS)
>
> There's more to be gained here if we can fix up the next stage. Right
> now if I set every CPU's bit in cpu_initialized_mask to allow them to
> proceed from wait_for_master_cpu() through to the end of cpu_init() and
> onwards through start_secondary(), they all end up hitting
> check_tsc_sync_target() in parallel and it goes horridly wrong.
Actually it breaks before that, in rcu_cpu_starting(). A spinlock
around that, an atomic_t to let the APs do their TSC sync one at a time
(both in the above tree now), and I have a 75% saving on CPU bringup
time for my 28-thread Haswell:
[ 0.307341] smp: Bringing up secondary CPUs ...
[ 0.307576] x86: Booting SMP configuration:
[ 0.307579] .... node #0, CPUs: #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 #8 #9 #10 #11 #12 #13 #14 #15 #16 #17 #18 #19 #20 #21 #22 #23 #24 #25 #26 #27
[ 0.320100] Brought 28 CPUs to x86/cpu:kick in 34645984 cycles
[ 0.325032] Brought 28 CPUs to x86/cpu:wait-init in 12865752 cycles
[ 0.326902] MDS CPU bug present and SMT on, data leak possible. See https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/admin-guide/hw-vuln/mds.html for more details.
[ 0.328739] Brought CPUs online in 11702224 cycles
[ 0.328739] smp: Brought up 1 node, 28 CPUs
[ 0.328739] smpboot: Max logical packages: 1
[ 0.328739] smpboot: Total of 28 processors activated (145261.81 BogoMIPS)
Download attachment "smime.p7s" of type "application/x-pkcs7-signature" (5174 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists