[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d2b31974527bc27cda4272e16ed40575ddc9764a.camel@bmw.de>
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2021 15:10:55 +0000
From: <Viktor.Rosendahl@....de>
To: <colin.king@...onical.com>
CC: <rostedt@...dmis.org>, <kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracing/tools: fix a couple of spelling mistakes
Hi,
Thanks for finding these mistakes.
On Tue, 2021-02-16 at 14:08 +0000, Colin King wrote:
> printf(
> -"Warning! Using trivial random nummer seed, since %s not available\n",
> +"Warning! Using trivial random number seed, since %s not available\n",
> DEV_URANDOM);
> fflush(stdout);
> *seed = i;
> @@ -1711,7 +1711,7 @@ static void show_usage(void)
> "\t\t\tbeginning, end, and backtrace.\n\n"
>
> "-g, --graph\t\tEnable the display-graph option in trace_option. This\n"
> -"\t\t\toption causes ftrace to show the functionph of how\n"
> +"\t\t\toption causes ftrace to show the graph of how\n"
> "\t\t\tfunctions are calling other functions.\n\n"
This is a large improvement but since the corrected word is so much shorter, we
would ideally move the first word of the next line to this line as well:
"\t\t\toption causes ftrace to show the graph of how functions\n"
"\t\t\tare calling other functions.\n\n"
best regards,
Viktor
>
> "-c, --policy POL\tRun the program with scheduling policy POL. POL can be\n"
Powered by blists - more mailing lists