linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] arm64: mm: correct the inside linear map boundaries during hotplug check

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1790afff-eebd-1eda-a1b4-0062908f1f32@arm.com>
Date:   Tue, 16 Feb 2021 08:42:26 +0530
From:   Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>
To:     Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
Cc:     Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@...ux.microsoft.com>,
        James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
        Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] arm64: mm: correct the inside linear map
 boundaries during hotplug check



On 2/16/21 1:21 AM, Pavel Tatashin wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 2:34 PM Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 15 Feb 2021 at 20:30, Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Can't we simply use signed arithmetic here? This expression works fine
>>>> if the quantities are all interpreted as s64 instead of u64
>>>
>>> I was thinking about that, but I do not like the idea of using sign
>>> arithmetics for physical addresses. Also, I am worried that someone in
>>> the future will unknowingly change it to unsigns or to phys_addr_t. It
>>> is safer to have start explicitly set to 0 in case of wrap.
>>
>> memstart_addr is already a s64 for this exact reason.
> 
> memstart_addr is basically an offset and it must be negative. For
> example, this would not work if it was not signed:
> #define vmemmap ((struct page *)VMEMMAP_START - (memstart_addr >> PAGE_SHIFT))
> 
> However, on powerpc it is phys_addr_t type.
> 
>>
>> Btw, the KASLR check is incorrect: memstart_addr could also be
>> negative when running the 52-bit VA kernel on hardware that is only
>> 48-bit VA capable.
> 
> Good point!
> 
> if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_VA_BITS_52) && (vabits_actual != 52))
>     memstart_addr -= _PAGE_OFFSET(48) - _PAGE_OFFSET(52);
> 
> So, I will remove IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_BASE) again.
> 
> I am OK to change start_linear_pa, end_linear_pa to signed, but IMO
> what I have now is actually safer to make sure that does not break
> again in the future.
An explicit check for the flip over and providing two different start
addresses points would be required in order to use the new framework.