linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v3 1/1] scsi: ufs: Enable power management for wlun

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210216173829.GB35819@stor-presley.qualcomm.com>
Date:   Tue, 16 Feb 2021 09:38:29 -0800
From:   Asutosh Das <asutoshd@...eaurora.org>
To:     Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
Cc:     cang@...eaurora.org, martin.petersen@...cle.com,
        linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        stern@...land.harvard.edu, Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
        Avri Altman <avri.altman@....com>,
        "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@...iatek.com>,
        Bean Huo <beanhuo@...ron.com>,
        Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>,
        Kiwoong Kim <kwmad.kim@...sung.com>,
        Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
        Satya Tangirala <satyat@...gle.com>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 1/1] scsi: ufs: Enable power management for wlun

On Fri, Feb 12 2021 at 19:25 -0800, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>On 2/11/21 11:18 AM, Asutosh Das wrote:
>> +static inline bool is_rpmb_wlun(struct scsi_device *sdev)
>> +{
>> +	return (sdev->lun == ufshcd_upiu_wlun_to_scsi_wlun(UFS_UPIU_RPMB_WLUN));
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline bool is_device_wlun(struct scsi_device *sdev)
>> +{
>> +	return (sdev->lun ==
>> +		ufshcd_upiu_wlun_to_scsi_wlun(UFS_UPIU_UFS_DEVICE_WLUN));
>> +}
>
>A minor comment: checkpatch should have reported that "return is not a
>function" for the above code.
>
>>  /**
>> + * ufshcd_setup_links - associate link b/w device wlun and other luns
>> + * @sdev: pointer to SCSI device
>> + * @hba: pointer to ufs hba
>> + *
>> + * Returns void
>> + */
>
>Please leave out "Returns void".
>
>> +static int ufshcd_wl_suspend(struct device *dev)
>> +{
>> +	struct scsi_device *sdev = to_scsi_device(dev);
>> +	struct ufs_hba *hba;
>> +	int ret;
>> +	ktime_t start = ktime_get();
>> +
>> +	if (is_rpmb_wlun(sdev))
>> +		return 0;
>> +	hba = shost_priv(sdev->host);
>> +	ret = __ufshcd_wl_suspend(hba, UFS_SYSTEM_PM);
>> +	if (ret)
>> +		dev_err(&sdev->sdev_gendev, "%s failed: %d\n", __func__,  ret);
>> +
>> +	trace_ufshcd_wl_suspend(dev_name(dev), ret,
>> +		ktime_to_us(ktime_sub(ktime_get(), start)),
>> +		hba->curr_dev_pwr_mode, hba->uic_link_state);
>> +
>> +	return ret;
>> +
>> +}
>
>Please remove the blank line after the return statement.
>
>Otherwise this patch looks good to me. Hence:
>
>Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
>

Done.

Thanks,
-asd