[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <255a5fba-d5a1-0c40-c26c-2f6ae0e91d56@metux.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2021 21:20:08 +0100
From: "Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult" <lkml@...ux.net>
To: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>, kernel-team@...roid.com,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] of: property: fw_devlink: Ignore interrupts property for
some configs
On 15.02.21 23:42, Saravana Kannan wrote:
Hi,
> diff --git a/drivers/of/property.c b/drivers/of/property.c
> index 79b68519fe30..5036a362f52e 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/property.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/property.c
> @@ -1300,6 +1300,9 @@ static struct device_node *parse_interrupts(struct device_node *np,
> {
> struct of_phandle_args sup_args;
>
> + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF_IRQ) || IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC))
> + return NULL;
> +
> if (strcmp(prop_name, "interrupts") &&
> strcmp(prop_name, "interrupts-extended"))
> return NULL;
wouldn't it be better to #ifdef-out the whole code in this case ?
--mtx
--
---
Hinweis: unverschlüsselte E-Mails können leicht abgehört und manipuliert
werden ! Für eine vertrauliche Kommunikation senden Sie bitte ihren
GPG/PGP-Schlüssel zu.
---
Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
Free software and Linux embedded engineering
info@...ux.net -- +49-151-27565287
Powered by blists - more mailing lists