[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YCwycC8hPsPD7ArU@cmpxchg.org>
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2021 16:00:32 -0500
From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
To: Chris Down <chris@...isdown.name>
Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, kernel-team@...com
Subject: Re: code style: Re: [PATCH v4] printk: Userspace format enumeration
support
On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 05:27:08PM +0000, Chris Down wrote:
> Petr Mladek writes:
> > I wonder if we could find a better name for the configure switch.
> > I have troubles to imagine what printk enumeration might mean.
> > Well, it might be because I am not a native speaker.
> >
> > Anyway, the word "enumeration" is used only in the configure option.
> > Everything else is "printk_fmt"
> >
> > What about DEBUG_PRINTK_FORMATS?
>
> Hmm, I don't like DEBUG_PRINTK_FMTS because it's not about debugging, it's
> about enumeration, I guess :-)
>
> The name should reflect that this catalogues the available printks in the
> kernel -- "debugging" seems to imply something different.
>
> I'm ok with a different name like "printk catalogue" or something like that
> if you prefer. Personally I think "printk enumeration" is fairly clear --
> it's about enumerating the available printks -- but anything that captures
> that spirit is fine.
How about config PRINTK_INDEX?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists