linux-kernel - linux-next: manual merge of the gpio-brgl tree with the arm-soc, net-next trees

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210216182338.35915450@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:   Tue, 16 Feb 2021 18:23:38 +1100
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Cc:     Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <nobuhiro1.iwamatsu@...hiba.co.jp>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the gpio-brgl tree with the arm-soc,
 net-next trees

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the gpio-brgl tree got a conflict in:

  arch/arm64/boot/dts/toshiba/tmpv7708-rm-mbrc.dts

between commits:

  4fd18fc38757 ("arm64: dts: visconti: Add watchdog support for TMPV7708 SoC")
  0109a17564fc ("arm: dts: visconti: Add DT support for Toshiba Visconti5 GPIO driver")
  ec8a42e73432 ("arm: dts: visconti: Add DT support for Toshiba Visconti5 ethernet controller")

from the arm-soc, net-next trees and commit:

  c988ae37c722 ("arm: dts: visconti: Add DT support for Toshiba Visconti5 GPIO driver")

from the gpio-brgl tree.

I fixed it up (I used the former version) and can carry the fix as
necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider
cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
particularly complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped