linux-kernel - Re: [External] Re: [PATCH 4/4] mm: memcontrol: fix swap uncharge on cgroup v2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMZfGtWw14a7MTJzY9MVBTRh5X9Qv0YbaBAqEaYPVHSy-SrcEg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 17 Feb 2021 13:11:47 +0800
From:   Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>
To:     Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Cc:     Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
        Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@...il.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Cgroups <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [External] Re: [PATCH 4/4] mm: memcontrol: fix swap uncharge on
 cgroup v2

On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 12:59 AM Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org> wrote:
>
> Hello Muchun,
>
> On Sat, Feb 13, 2021 at 01:01:59AM +0800, Muchun Song wrote:
> > The swap charges the actual number of swap entries on cgroup v2.
> > If a swap cache page is charged successful, and then we uncharge
> > the swap counter. It is wrong on cgroup v2. Because the swap
> > entry is not freed.
>
> The patch makes sense to me. But this code is a bit tricky, we should
> add more documentation to how it works and what the problem is.
>
> How about this for the changelog?
>
> ---
> mm: memcontrol: fix swap undercounting for shared pages in cgroup2
>
> When shared pages are swapped in partially, we can have some page
> tables referencing the in-memory page and some referencing the swap
> slot. Cgroup1 and cgroup2 handle these overlapping lifetimes slightly
> differently due to the nature of how they account memory and swap:
>
> Cgroup1 has a unified memory+swap counter that tracks a data page
> regardless whether it's in-core or swapped out. On swapin, we transfer
> the charge from the swap entry to the newly allocated swapcache page,
> even though the swap entry might stick around for a while. That's why
> we have a mem_cgroup_uncharge_swap() call inside mem_cgroup_charge().
>
> Cgroup2 tracks memory and swap as separate, independent resources and
> thus has split memory and swap counters. On swapin, we charge the
> newly allocated swapcache page as memory, while the swap slot in turn
> must remain charged to the swap counter as long as its allocated too.
>
> The cgroup2 logic was broken by commit 2d1c498072de ("mm: memcontrol:
> make swap tracking an integral part of memory control"), because it
> accidentally removed the do_memsw_account() check in the branch inside
> mem_cgroup_uncharge() that was supposed to tell the difference between
> the charge transfer in cgroup1 and the separate counters in cgroup2.
>
> As a result, cgroup2 currently undercounts consumed swap when shared
> pages are partially swapped back in. This in turn allows a cgroup to
> consume more swap than its configured limit intends.
>
> Add the do_memsw_account() check back to fix this problem.

Thanks. Sorry for my poor English. I should improve my changelog.

> ---
>
> > Fixes: 2d1c498072de ("mm: memcontrol: make swap tracking an integral part of memory control")
> > Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>
>
> Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>

Thanks.

>
> > ---
> >  mm/memcontrol.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> > index c737c8f05992..be6bc5044150 100644
> > --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> > +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> > @@ -6753,7 +6753,7 @@ int mem_cgroup_charge(struct page *page, struct mm_struct *mm, gfp_t gfp_mask)
> >       memcg_check_events(memcg, page);
> >       local_irq_enable();
> >
> > -     if (PageSwapCache(page)) {
> > +     if (!cgroup_subsys_on_dfl(memory_cgrp_subsys) && PageSwapCache(page)) {
>
> It's more descriptive to use do_memsw_account() here, IMO.
>
> We should also add a comment. How about this above the branch?

I will add a comment here. Thanks.

>
>         /*
>          * Cgroup1's unified memory+swap counter has been charged with the
>          * new swapcache page, finish the transfer by uncharging the swap
>          * slot. The swap slot would also get uncharged when it dies, but
>          * for shared pages it can stick around indefinitely and we'd count
>          * the page twice the entire time.
>          *
>          * Cgroup2 has separate resource counters for memory and swap,
>          * so this is a non-issue here. Memory and swap charge lifetimes
>          * correspond 1:1 to page and swap slot lifetimes: we charge the
>          * page to memory here, and uncharge swap when the slot is freed.
>          */