lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 17 Feb 2021 08:00:36 +0200
From:   Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
To:     DooHyun Hwang <dh0421.hwang@...sung.com>,
        linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, ulf.hansson@...aro.org,
        robh+dt@...nel.org, axboe@...nel.dk, satyat@...gle.com,
        ebiggers@...gle.com, gustavoars@...nel.org
Cc:     grant.jung@...sung.com, jt77.jang@...sung.com,
        junwoo80.lee@...sung.com, jangsub.yi@...sung.com,
        sh043.lee@...sung.com, cw9316.lee@...sung.com,
        sh8267.baek@...sung.com, wkon.kim@...sung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mmc: core: Add no single read retries

On 17/02/21 7:46 am, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> On 17/02/21 7:22 am, DooHyun Hwang wrote:
>> This makes to handle read errors faster by not retrying
>> multiple block read(CMD18) errors with single block reads(CMD17).
>>
>> On some bad SD Cards that have problem with read operations,
>> it is not helpful to retry multiple block read errors with
>> several single block reads, and it is delayed to treat read
>> operations as I/O error as much as retrying single block reads.
> 
> If the issue is that it takes too long, then maybe it would be better to get
> mmc_blk_read_single() to give up after a certain amount of time.
> 

So that a device property would not be needed I mean.  Then everyone would
benefit.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ