linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] exfat: add initial ioctl function

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <78a7f3ec-f5c2-071a-506c-b19b21b9b04c@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 17 Feb 2021 09:33:18 +0900
From:   Hyeongseok Kim <hyeongseok@...il.com>
To:     Chaitanya Kulkarni <Chaitanya.Kulkarni@....com>,
        "namjae.jeon@...sung.com" <namjae.jeon@...sung.com>,
        "sj1557.seo@...sung.com" <sj1557.seo@...sung.com>
Cc:     "linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] exfat: add initial ioctl function

On 2/17/21 9:17 AM, Chaitanya Kulkarni wrote:
> On 2/16/21 16:13, Hyeongseok Kim wrote:
>> Sorry, I don't understand exactly.
>> You're saying that these 2 patch should be merged to a single patch?
>> Would it be better?
> I think so unless there is a specific reason for this to keep it isolated.
>
The reason was just that I think it seems better to seperate ioctl 
initializing and adding specific ioctl functionality.
Anyway, I got it.

Namjae,
Do you have any other opinion about this?
If you agree, I'll merge these as one.