[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210217102448.oea5dwl2qnhybir3@skbuf>
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2021 10:24:49 +0000
From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
To: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>
CC: "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
"jiri@...nulli.us" <jiri@...nulli.us>,
"ivecera@...hat.com" <ivecera@...hat.com>,
"nikolay@...dia.com" <nikolay@...dia.com>,
"roopa@...dia.com" <roopa@...dia.com>,
Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>,
"alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com" <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
"UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com" <UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>,
"andrew@...n.ch" <andrew@...n.ch>,
"vivien.didelot@...il.com" <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
"f.fainelli@...il.com" <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
"rasmus.villemoes@...vas.dk" <rasmus.villemoes@...vas.dk>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org"
<bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 8/8] net: dsa: felix: Add support for MRP
On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 10:42:05PM +0100, Horatiu Vultur wrote:
> @@ -112,6 +113,7 @@ static struct sk_buff *ocelot_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb,
> ocelot_xfh_get_qos_class(extraction, &qos_class);
> ocelot_xfh_get_tag_type(extraction, &tag_type);
> ocelot_xfh_get_vlan_tci(extraction, &vlan_tci);
> + ocelot_xfh_get_cpuq(extraction, &cpuq);
>
> skb->dev = dsa_master_find_slave(netdev, 0, src_port);
> if (!skb->dev)
> @@ -126,6 +128,12 @@ static struct sk_buff *ocelot_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb,
> skb->offload_fwd_mark = 1;
> skb->priority = qos_class;
>
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BRIDGE_MRP)
> + if (eth_hdr(skb)->h_proto == cpu_to_be16(ETH_P_MRP) &&
> + cpuq & BIT(OCELOT_MRP_CPUQ))
Checking the EtherType seems redundant, since those are the only frames
trapped to the MRP CPU queue.
Also, the cpuq variable is potentially unused when CONFIG_BRIDGE_MRP is
unset. I'm concerned that static analysis people may come in and try to
fix it up with even more ifdeffery, which is definitely not what I would
like to go for.
How about just the following, which is not conditionally compiled:
if (!(cpuq & BIT(OCELOT_MRP_CPUQ)))
skb->offload_fwd_mark = 1;
> + skb->offload_fwd_mark = 0;
> +#endif
> +
> /* Ocelot switches copy frames unmodified to the CPU. However, it is
> * possible for the user to request a VLAN modification through
> * VCAP_IS1_ACT_VID_REPLACE_ENA. In this case, what will happen is that
> --
> 2.27.0
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists