[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a96ca801-06a4-952c-a58d-7325eea92c32@ideasonboard.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2021 13:08:30 +0000
From: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham+renesas@...asonboard.com>
To: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+renesas@...ndi.org>,
laurent.pinchart+renesas@...asonboard.com,
niklas.soderlund+renesas@...natech.se, geert@...ux-m68k.org
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/16] media: i2c: rdacm20: Check return values
Hi Jacopo,
On 16/02/2021 17:41, Jacopo Mondi wrote:
> The camera module initialization routine does not check the return
> value of a few functions. Fix that.
>
Sounds quite valid to me.
Reviewed-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham+renesas@...asonboard.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+renesas@...ndi.org>
> ---
> drivers/media/i2c/rdacm20.c | 13 +++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/rdacm20.c b/drivers/media/i2c/rdacm20.c
> index 56406d82b5ac..e982373908f2 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/i2c/rdacm20.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/rdacm20.c
> @@ -470,11 +470,16 @@ static int rdacm20_initialize(struct rdacm20_device *dev)
> * Ensure that we have a good link configuration before attempting to
> * identify the device.
> */
> - max9271_configure_i2c(&dev->serializer, MAX9271_I2CSLVSH_469NS_234NS |
> - MAX9271_I2CSLVTO_1024US |
> - MAX9271_I2CMSTBT_105KBPS);
> + ret = max9271_configure_i2c(&dev->serializer,
> + MAX9271_I2CSLVSH_469NS_234NS |
> + MAX9271_I2CSLVTO_1024US |
> + MAX9271_I2CMSTBT_105KBPS);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
>
> - max9271_configure_gmsl_link(&dev->serializer);
> + ret = max9271_configure_gmsl_link(&dev->serializer);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
>
> ret = max9271_verify_id(&dev->serializer);
> if (ret < 0)
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists