[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YC0lkDRXcR8Rg7+h@kroah.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2021 15:17:52 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
Cc: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/4] firmware: Add the support for ZSTD-compressed
firmware files
On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 02:34:34PM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Feb 2021 14:24:19 +0100,
> Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 04:49:36PM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > > Due to the popular demands on ZSTD, here is a patch to add a support
> > > of ZSTD-compressed firmware files via the direct firmware loader.
> > > It's just like XZ-compressed file support, providing a decompressor
> > > with ZSTD. Since ZSTD API can give the decompression size beforehand,
> > > the code is even simpler than XZ.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
> >
> > It also occurs to me that having a simple like #define HAVE_FIRMWARE_COMPRESS_ZSTD
> > on include/linux/firmware.h would enable userspace to be aware (if they
> > have kernel sources) to determine if the kernels supports this format.
>
> Extending that idea, we might want to have a sysfs entry showing the
> supported formats instead? This will allow to judge dynamically.
What could userspace do with that information?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists