linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/21] [Set 2] Rid W=1 warnings from Clock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 17 Feb 2021 10:08:30 -0800
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Prashant Gaikwad <pgaikwad@...dia.com>,
        Tomer Maimon <tmaimon77@...il.com>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Rajeev Kumar <rajeev-dlh.kumar@...com>,
        Jan Kotas <jank@...ence.com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
        Boris BREZILLON <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
        Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@...gutronix.de>,
        Benjamin Fair <benjaminfair@...gle.com>,
        Emilio López <emilio@...pez.com.ar>,
        Viresh Kumar <vireshk@...nel.org>, openbmc@...ts.ozlabs.org,
        Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
        Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
        Nancy Yuen <yuenn@...gle.com>, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>, Loc Ho <lho@....com>,
        NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
        Richard Woodruff <r-woodruff2@...com>,
        Tali Perry <tali.perry1@...il.com>,
        Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
        Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
        linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
        Shiraz Hashim <shiraz.linux.kernel@...il.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Sören Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@...inx.com>,
        Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...l.net>,
        Tero Kristo <kristo@...nel.org>,
        Rajan Vaja <rajan.vaja@...inx.com>,
        Avi Fishman <avifishman70@...il.com>,
        Patrick Venture <venture@...gle.com>,
        Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org,
        Nuvoton Technologies <tali.perry@...oton.com>,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
        Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/21] [Set 2] Rid W=1 warnings from Clock

On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 08:20:46 +0000 Lee Jones wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Feb 2021, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Mon, 15 Feb 2021 08:49:52 +0000 Lee Jones wrote:  
> > > Yes, please share.  
> > 
> > https://github.com/kuba-moo/nipa  
> 
> Thanks for this.
> 
> Oh, I see.  So you conduct tests locally, then post them up in a
> section called 'Checks' using the provided API.  

For some definition of "locally" - NIPA runs on a rented VM.

> I assume that Patchwork does not alert the user when something has
> gone awry?  Is this something Nipa does?

The way we run it on netdev is maintainer-centric, IOW we see 
the failures in patchwork and complain to people manually.
The netdev mailing list gets too many messages as is, if NIPA 
responded with results automatically (which is not that hard
technically) my concern is that people would be more likely to
send untested patches to the mailing list and rely on the bot.