[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ab14f5a0bde2bdcd4bb0128f76e5a3ba8e7b0894.camel@collabora.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2021 16:39:49 -0300
From: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@...labora.com>
To: Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@...labora.com>,
p.zabel@...gutronix.de, mchehab@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
shawnguo@...nel.org, s.hauer@...gutronix.de, kernel@...gutronix.de,
festevam@...il.com, linux-imx@....com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
mripard@...nel.org, paul.kocialkowski@...tlin.com, wens@...e.org,
jernej.skrabec@...l.net, krzk@...nel.org, shengjiu.wang@....com,
adrian.ratiu@...labora.com, aisheng.dong@....com, peng.fan@....com,
Anson.Huang@....com, hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl
Cc: linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
kernel@...labora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 03/18] arm64: dts: imx8mq-evk: add reserve memory
node for CMA region
Hi Benjamin,
On Wed, 2021-02-17 at 09:02 +0100, Benjamin Gaignard wrote:
> Define allocation range for the default CMA region.
>
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@...labora.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@...labora.com>
Despite it seems like I signed-off this one...
> Signed-off-by: Adrian Ratiu <adrian.ratiu@...labora.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mq-evk.dts | 15 +++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mq-evk.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mq-evk.dts
> index 85b045253a0e..047dfd4a1ffd 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mq-evk.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mq-evk.dts
> @@ -21,6 +21,21 @@ memory@...00000 {
> reg = <0x00000000 0x40000000 0 0xc0000000>;
> };
>
>
> + resmem: reserved-memory {
> + #address-cells = <2>;
> + #size-cells = <2>;
> + ranges;
> +
> + /* global autoconfigured region for contiguous allocations */
> + linux,cma {
> + compatible = "shared-dma-pool";
> + reusable;
> + size = <0 0x3c000000>;
> + alloc-ranges = <0 0x40000000 0 0x40000000>;
> + linux,cma-default;
> + };
... I'm not a fan of the change :)
Hopefully someone from NXP can provide some insight here?
If it's absolutely needed for the VPU, then I guess it should
be 1) very well documented and 2) moved to the top-lovel dtsi.
But if we can drop it, that'd be nicer.
Thanks,
Ezequiel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists