[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210217204551.GA25685@innovation.ch>
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2021 12:45:51 -0800
From: "Life is hard, and then you die" <ronald@...ovation.ch>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Cc: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
Sergiu Cuciurean <sergiu.cuciurean@...log.com>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Input: applespi: Don't wait for responses to
commands indefinitely.
Hi Dmitry,
On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 12:23:23PM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 11:07:16AM -0800, Ronald Tschalär wrote:
> > @@ -869,7 +878,7 @@ static int applespi_send_cmd_msg(struct applespi_data *applespi)
> > return sts;
> > }
> >
> > - applespi->cmd_msg_queued = true;
> > + applespi->cmd_msg_queued = ktime_get();
>
> Will it be OK if I change this to ktime_get_coarse()? I do not think we
> need exact time here, and the coarse variant is cheaper I believe.
Certainly - I just wasn't aware of the coarse variant.
Cheers,
Ronald
Powered by blists - more mailing lists