[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YC2d0ZkdCOJEWlng@google.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2021 14:50:57 -0800
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ben Gardon <bgardon@...gle.com>,
Makarand Sonare <makarandsonare@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/14] KVM: x86/mmu: Dirty logging fixes and improvements
On Fri, Feb 12, 2021, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> Paolo, this is more or less ready, but on final read-through before
> sending I realized it would be a good idea to WARN during VM destruction
> if cpu_dirty_logging_count is non-zero. I wanted to get you this before
> the 5.12 window opens in case you want the TDP MMU fixes for 5.12. I'll
> do the above change and retest next week (note, Monday is a US holiday).
Verified cpu_dirty_logging_count does indeed hit zero during VM destruction.
Adding a WARN to KVM would require adding an arch hook to kvm_free_memslots(),
otherwise the count will be non-zero if the VM is destroyed with dirty logging
active. That doesn't seem worthwhile, so I'm not planning on pursuing a WARN
for the upstream code.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists