lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKwvOd=yYx=c=5TR6BY3nPUTQpn5tvSuD7X-KwZyGq5gTwA73g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 17 Feb 2021 15:39:35 -0800
From:   Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
To:     Jianlin Lv <Jianlin.Lv@....com>
Cc:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>, fche@...hat.com,
        Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>, sumanthk@...ux.ibm.com,
        iecedge@...il.com, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] perf probe: fix kretprobe issue caused by GCC bug

On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 2:30 AM Jianlin Lv <Jianlin.Lv@....com> wrote:
>
> Perf failed to add kretprobe event with debuginfo of vmlinux which is
> compiled by gcc with -fpatchable-function-entry option enabled.
> The same issue with kernel module.
>
> Issue:
>
>   # perf probe  -v 'kernel_clone%return $retval'
>   ......
>   Writing event: r:probe/kernel_clone__return _text+599624 $retval
>   Failed to write event: Invalid argument
>     Error: Failed to add events. Reason: Invalid argument (Code: -22)
>
>   # cat /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/error_log
>   [156.75] trace_kprobe: error: Retprobe address must be an function entry
>   Command: r:probe/kernel_clone__return _text+599624 $retval
>                                         ^
>
>   # llvm-dwarfdump  vmlinux |grep  -A 10  -w 0x00df2c2b
>   0x00df2c2b:   DW_TAG_subprogram
>                 DW_AT_external  (true)
>                 DW_AT_name      ("kernel_clone")
>                 DW_AT_decl_file ("/home/code/linux-next/kernel/fork.c")
>                 DW_AT_decl_line (2423)
>                 DW_AT_decl_column       (0x07)
>                 DW_AT_prototyped        (true)
>                 DW_AT_type      (0x00dcd492 "pid_t")
>                 DW_AT_low_pc    (0xffff800010092648)
>                 DW_AT_high_pc   (0xffff800010092b9c)
>                 DW_AT_frame_base        (DW_OP_call_frame_cfa)
>
>   # cat /proc/kallsyms |grep kernel_clone
>   ffff800010092640 T kernel_clone
>   # readelf -s vmlinux |grep -i kernel_clone
>   183173: ffff800010092640  1372 FUNC    GLOBAL DEFAULT    2 kernel_clone
>
>   # objdump -d vmlinux |grep -A 10  -w \<kernel_clone\>:
>   ffff800010092640 <kernel_clone>:
>   ffff800010092640:       d503201f        nop
>   ffff800010092644:       d503201f        nop
>   ffff800010092648:       d503233f        paciasp
>   ffff80001009264c:       a9b87bfd        stp     x29, x30, [sp, #-128]!
>   ffff800010092650:       910003fd        mov     x29, sp
>   ffff800010092654:       a90153f3        stp     x19, x20, [sp, #16]
>
> The entry address of kernel_clone converted by debuginfo is _text+599624
> (0x92648), which is consistent with the value of DW_AT_low_pc attribute.
> But the symbolic address of kernel_clone from /proc/kallsyms is
> ffff800010092640.
>
> This issue is found on arm64, -fpatchable-function-entry=2 is enabled when
> CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS=y;
> Just as objdump displayed the assembler contents of kernel_clone,
> GCC generate 2 NOPs  at the beginning of each function.
>
> kprobe_on_func_entry detects that (_text+599624) is not the entry address
> of the function, which leads to the failure of adding kretprobe event.
>
> kprobe_on_func_entry
> ->_kprobe_addr
> ->kallsyms_lookup_size_offset
> ->arch_kprobe_on_func_entry             // FALSE
>
> The cause of the issue is that the first instruction in the compile unit
> indicated by DW_AT_low_pc does not include NOPs.
> This issue exists in all gcc versions that support
> -fpatchable-function-entry option.
>
> I have reported it to the GCC community:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98776
>
> Currently arm64 and PA-RISC may enable fpatchable-function-entry option.
> The kernel compiled with clang does not have this issue.

Thank you for taking the time to check and verify with Clang. I appreciate it!

>
> FIX:
>
> This GCC issue only cause the registration failure of the kretprobe event
> which doesn't need debuginfo. So, stop using debuginfo for retprobe.
> map will be used to query the probe function address.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jianlin Lv <Jianlin.Lv@....com>
> ---
> v2: stop using debuginfo for retprobe, and update changelog.
> v3: Update changelog, fixed misuse of --- marker.
> ---
>  tools/perf/util/probe-event.c | 10 ++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/probe-event.c b/tools/perf/util/probe-event.c
> index 8eae2afff71a..a59d3268adb0 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/probe-event.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/probe-event.c
> @@ -894,6 +894,16 @@ static int try_to_find_probe_trace_events(struct perf_probe_event *pev,
>         struct debuginfo *dinfo;
>         int ntevs, ret = 0;
>
> +       /* Workaround for gcc #98776 issue.
> +        * Perf failed to add kretprobe event with debuginfo of vmlinux which is
> +        * compiled by gcc with -fpatchable-function-entry option enabled. The
> +        * same issue with kernel module. The retprobe doesn`t need debuginfo.
> +        * This workaround solution use map to query the probe function address
> +        * for retprobe event.
> +        */
> +       if (pev->point.retprobe)
> +               return 0;
> +
>         dinfo = open_debuginfo(pev->target, pev->nsi, !need_dwarf);
>         if (!dinfo) {
>                 if (need_dwarf)
> --
> 2.25.1
>


-- 
Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ