[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e59d88ad-7523-01aa-e1c3-f2fe6a695f0b@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 15:05:58 +0800
From: chenzhou <chenzhou10@...wei.com>
To: Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
CC: <mingo@...hat.com>, <tglx@...utronix.de>, <rppt@...nel.org>,
<dyoung@...hat.com>, <catalin.marinas@....com>, <will@...nel.org>,
<nsaenzjulienne@...e.de>, <corbet@....net>,
<John.P.donnelly@...cle.com>, <prabhakar.pkin@...il.com>,
<horms@...ge.net.au>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>, <arnd@...db.de>,
<james.morse@....com>, <xiexiuqi@...wei.com>,
<guohanjun@...wei.com>, <huawei.libin@...wei.com>,
<wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>, <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <kexec@...ts.infradead.org>,
kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 06/11] x86/elf: Move vmcore_elf_check_arch_cross to
arch/x86/include/asm/elf.h
On 2021/2/18 14:31, Baoquan He wrote:
> On 01/30/21 at 03:10pm, Chen Zhou wrote:
>> Move macro vmcore_elf_check_arch_cross from arch/x86/include/asm/kexec.h
>> to arch/x86/include/asm/elf.h to fix the following compiling warning:
>>
>> make ARCH=i386
>> In file included from arch/x86/kernel/setup.c:39:0:
>> ./arch/x86/include/asm/kexec.h:77:0: warning: "vmcore_elf_check_arch_cross" redefined
>> # define vmcore_elf_check_arch_cross(x) ((x)->e_machine == EM_X86_64)
>>
>> In file included from arch/x86/kernel/setup.c:9:0:
>> ./include/linux/crash_dump.h:39:0: note: this is the location of the previous definition
>> #define vmcore_elf_check_arch_cross(x) 0
>>
>> The root cause is that vmcore_elf_check_arch_cross under CONFIG_CRASH_CORE
>> depend on CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE. Commit 2db65f1db17d ("x86: kdump: move
>> reserve_crashkernel[_low]() into crash_core.c") triggered the issue.
>>
>> Suggested by Mike, simply move vmcore_elf_check_arch_cross from
>> arch/x86/include/asm/kexec.h to arch/x86/include/asm/elf.h to fix
>> the warning.
>>
>> Fixes: 2db65f1db17d ("x86: kdump: move reserve_crashkernel[_low]() into crash_core.c")
> Where does this commit id '2db65f1db17d' come from? Here you are fixing
> another pathc in the same patchset. Please merge this with patch 05/11.
Yeah, the commit id is invalid, i will merge this patch with patch 05/11.
Thanks,
Chen Zhou
>
>> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
>> Suggested-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Chen Zhou <chenzhou10@...wei.com>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/include/asm/elf.h | 3 +++
>> arch/x86/include/asm/kexec.h | 3 ---
>> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/elf.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/elf.h
>> index 66bdfe838d61..5333777cc758 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/elf.h
>> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/elf.h
>> @@ -94,6 +94,9 @@ extern unsigned int vdso32_enabled;
>>
>> #define elf_check_arch(x) elf_check_arch_ia32(x)
>>
>> +/* We can also handle crash dumps from 64 bit kernel. */
>> +# define vmcore_elf_check_arch_cross(x) ((x)->e_machine == EM_X86_64)
>> +
>> /* SVR4/i386 ABI (pages 3-31, 3-32) says that when the program starts %edx
>> contains a pointer to a function which might be registered using `atexit'.
>> This provides a mean for the dynamic linker to call DT_FINI functions for
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kexec.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kexec.h
>> index 2b18f918203e..6fcae01a9cca 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kexec.h
>> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kexec.h
>> @@ -72,9 +72,6 @@ struct kimage;
>>
>> /* The native architecture */
>> # define KEXEC_ARCH KEXEC_ARCH_386
>> -
>> -/* We can also handle crash dumps from 64 bit kernel. */
>> -# define vmcore_elf_check_arch_cross(x) ((x)->e_machine == EM_X86_64)
>> #else
>> /* Maximum physical address we can use pages from */
>> # define KEXEC_SOURCE_MEMORY_LIMIT (MAXMEM-1)
>> --
>> 2.20.1
>>
> .
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists