linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v14 09/11] x86, arm64: Add ARCH_WANT_RESERVE_CRASH

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210218074047.GA468@MiWiFi-R3L-srv>
Date:   Thu, 18 Feb 2021 15:40:47 +0800
From:   Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
To:     Chen Zhou <chenzhou10@...wei.com>, rppt@...nel.org
Cc:     mingo@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de, dyoung@...hat.com,
        catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org, nsaenzjulienne@...e.de,
        corbet@....net, John.P.donnelly@...cle.com,
        prabhakar.pkin@...il.com, horms@...ge.net.au, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        arnd@...db.de, james.morse@....com, xiexiuqi@...wei.com,
        guohanjun@...wei.com, huawei.libin@...wei.com,
        wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kexec@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 09/11] x86, arm64: Add ARCH_WANT_RESERVE_CRASH_KERNEL
 config

On 02/18/21 at 03:31pm, Baoquan He wrote:
> On 01/30/21 at 03:10pm, Chen Zhou wrote:
> > We make the functions reserve_crashkernel[_low]() as generic for
> > x86 and arm64. Since reserve_crashkernel[_low]() implementations
> > are quite similar on other architectures as well, we can have more
> > users of this later.
> > 
> > So have CONFIG_ARCH_WANT_RESERVE_CRASH_KERNEL in arch/Kconfig and
> > select this by X86 and ARM64.
> > 
> > Suggested-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>
> > Suggested-by: Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Chen Zhou <chenzhou10@...wei.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/Kconfig        | 3 +++
> >  arch/arm64/Kconfig  | 1 +
> >  arch/x86/Kconfig    | 2 ++
> >  kernel/crash_core.c | 7 ++-----
> >  4 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/Kconfig b/arch/Kconfig
> > index 24862d15f3a3..0ca1ff5bb157 100644
> > --- a/arch/Kconfig
> > +++ b/arch/Kconfig
> > @@ -24,6 +24,9 @@ config KEXEC_ELF
> >  config HAVE_IMA_KEXEC
> >  	bool
> >  
> > +config ARCH_WANT_RESERVE_CRASH_KERNEL
> > +	bool
> > +
> >  config SET_FS
> >  	bool
> >  
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> > index f39568b28ec1..09365c7ff469 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> > @@ -82,6 +82,7 @@ config ARM64
> >  	select ARCH_WANT_FRAME_POINTERS
> >  	select ARCH_WANT_HUGE_PMD_SHARE if ARM64_4K_PAGES || (ARM64_16K_PAGES && !ARM64_VA_BITS_36)
> >  	select ARCH_WANT_LD_ORPHAN_WARN
> > +	select ARCH_WANT_RESERVE_CRASH_KERNEL if KEXEC_CORE
> >  	select ARCH_HAS_UBSAN_SANITIZE_ALL
> >  	select ARM_AMBA
> >  	select ARM_ARCH_TIMER
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> > index 21f851179ff0..e6926fcb4a40 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
> > +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> > @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ config X86_32
> >  	depends on !64BIT
> >  	# Options that are inherently 32-bit kernel only:
> >  	select ARCH_WANT_IPC_PARSE_VERSION
> > +	select ARCH_WANT_RESERVE_CRASH_KERNEL if KEXEC_CORE
> >  	select CLKSRC_I8253
> >  	select CLONE_BACKWARDS
> >  	select GENERIC_VDSO_32
> > @@ -28,6 +29,7 @@ config X86_64
> >  	select ARCH_HAS_GIGANTIC_PAGE
> >  	select ARCH_SUPPORTS_INT128 if CC_HAS_INT128
> >  	select ARCH_USE_CMPXCHG_LOCKREF
> > +	select ARCH_WANT_RESERVE_CRASH_KERNEL if KEXEC_CORE
> >  	select HAVE_ARCH_SOFT_DIRTY
> >  	select MODULES_USE_ELF_RELA
> >  	select NEED_DMA_MAP_STATE
> > diff --git a/kernel/crash_core.c b/kernel/crash_core.c
> > index 8479be270c0b..2c5783985db5 100644
> > --- a/kernel/crash_core.c
> > +++ b/kernel/crash_core.c
> > @@ -320,9 +320,7 @@ int __init parse_crashkernel_low(char *cmdline,
> >   * --------- Crashkernel reservation ------------------------------
> >   */
> >  
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE
> > -
> > -#if defined(CONFIG_X86) || defined(CONFIG_ARM64)
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_WANT_RESERVE_CRASH_KERNEL
> >  static int __init reserve_crashkernel_low(void)
> >  {
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
> > @@ -450,8 +448,7 @@ void __init reserve_crashkernel(void)
> >  	crashk_res.start = crash_base;
> >  	crashk_res.end   = crash_base + crash_size - 1;
> >  }
> > -#endif
> > -#endif /* CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE */
> > +#endif /* CONFIG_ARCH_WANT_RESERVE_CRASH_KERNEL */
> 
> Why don't you move the dummy reserve_crashkernel() here too?
> 
> #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_WANT_RESERVE_CRASH_KERNEL
> #ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE
> ...
>   '...the real crashkernel reservation code...'
> ...
> #else                     
> static void __init reserve_crashkernel(void)
> {
> }                                               
> #endif
> #endif /* CONFIG_ARCH_WANT_RESERVE_CRASH_KERNEL */
> 
> Like this, you don't need those two dummy reserve_crashkernel() in x86
> and arm64?

Sorry, I was wrong. It's impossible like this since
CONFIG_ARCH_WANT_RESERVE_CRASH_KERNEL is selected only if KEXEC_CORE is
true. Please ignore this comment.