[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210218081624.GA337128@infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 08:16:24 +0000
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com>, Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/8] x86/mm/tlb: Open-code on_each_cpu_cond_mask() for
tlb_is_not_lazy()
On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 02:16:48PM -0800, Nadav Amit wrote:
> + /*
> + * Although we could have used on_each_cpu_cond_mask(),
> + * open-coding it has performance advantages, as it eliminates
> + * the need for indirect calls or retpolines. In addition, it
> + * allows to use a designated cpumask for evaluating the
> + * condition, instead of allocating one.
> + *
> + * This code works under the assumption that there are no nested
> + * TLB flushes, an assumption that is already made in
> + * flush_tlb_mm_range().
> + *
> + * cond_cpumask is logically a stack-local variable, but it is
> + * more efficient to have it off the stack and not to allocate
> + * it on demand. Preemption is disabled and this code is
> + * non-reentrant.
> + */
> + struct cpumask *cond_cpumask = this_cpu_ptr(&flush_tlb_mask);
> + int cpu;
> +
> + cpumask_clear(cond_cpumask);
> +
> + for_each_cpu(cpu, cpumask) {
> + if (tlb_is_not_lazy(cpu))
> + __cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, cond_cpumask);
> + }
> + smp_call_function_many(cond_cpumask, flush_tlb_func, (void *)info, 1);
No need for the cast here, which would also avoid the pointlessly
overly long line.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists