[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8b4de9eae773a43b38f42c8ab6d9d23c@walle.cc>
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 09:27:09 +0100
From: Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] irqdomain: remove debugfs_file from struct irq_domain
Am 2021-02-18 08:31, schrieb Greg KH:
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 09:50:38PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> On Wed, 17 Feb 2021 20:10:50 +0000,
>> Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc> wrote:
>> >
>> > Am 2021-02-17 21:02, schrieb Marc Zyngier:
>> > > On 2021-02-17 19:57, Michael Walle wrote:
>> > >> Hi Greg,
>> > >>
>> > >>> There's no need to keep around a dentry pointer to a simple file that
>> > >>> debugfs itself can look up when we need to remove it from the system.
>> > >>> So simplify the code by deleting the variable and cleaning up the
>> > >>> logic
>> > >>> around the debugfs file.
>> > >>
>> > >> This will generate the following oops on my board (arm64,
>> > >> freescale/fsl-ls1028a-kontron-sl28-var3-ads2.dts). In debugfs_lookup()
>> > >> debugfs_mount is NULL.
>> > >
>> > > That's odd. I gave it a go yesterday, and nothing blew up.
>> > > Which makes me wonder whether I had the debug stuff enabled
>> > > the first place...
>> > >
>> > > I've dropped the patch from -next for now until I figure it out
>> > > (probably tomorrow).
>> >
>> > Mh, maybe its my .config, I've attached it. I also noticed that
>> > the board boots just fine in our kernel-ci [1].
>>
>> I reproduced here. I had disabled GENERIC_IRQ_DEBUGFS for obscure
>> reasons, and it caught fire as I re-enabled it.
>>
>> Adding this fixes it for me:
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c b/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c
>> index 367ff1c35f75..d8a14cf1a7b6 100644
>> --- a/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c
>> +++ b/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c
>> @@ -1904,7 +1904,8 @@ static void debugfs_add_domain_dir(struct
>> irq_domain *d)
>>
>> static void debugfs_remove_domain_dir(struct irq_domain *d)
>> {
>> - debugfs_remove(debugfs_lookup(d->name, domain_dir));
>> + if (domain_dir)
>> + debugfs_remove(debugfs_lookup(d->name, domain_dir));
>> }
>>
>> void __init irq_domain_debugfs_init(struct dentry *root)
>>
>>
>> Could you please check whether it works for you?
>
> Can you try this debugfs core change instead? Callers to debugfs
> should
> not have to do the above type of checking as debugfs should be much
> more
> robust than that.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
>
> diff --git a/fs/debugfs/inode.c b/fs/debugfs/inode.c
> index 2fcf66473436..5aa798f52b6e 100644
> --- a/fs/debugfs/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/debugfs/inode.c
> @@ -297,7 +297,7 @@ struct dentry *debugfs_lookup(const char *name,
> struct dentry *parent)
> {
> struct dentry *dentry;
>
> - if (IS_ERR(parent))
> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(name) || IS_ERR(parent))
> return NULL;
>
> if (!parent)
This doesn't work. name is not NULL when it is called.
What has to happen before debugfs_lookup() can be called? Looks like
someone has to initialize the static debugfs_mount, first.
-michael
Powered by blists - more mailing lists