[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e58cbb53-5f5b-42ae-54a0-e3e1b76ad271@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 09:55:07 +0100
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@....com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
George Kennedy <george.kennedy@...cle.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad@...nok.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>,
Peter Collingbourne <pcc@...gle.com>,
Evgenii Stepanov <eugenis@...gle.com>,
Branislav Rankov <Branislav.Rankov@....com>,
Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@....com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
kasan-dev@...glegroups.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm, kasan: don't poison boot memory
On 17.02.21 21:56, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
> During boot, all non-reserved memblock memory is exposed to the buddy
> allocator. Poisoning all that memory with KASAN lengthens boot time,
> especially on systems with large amount of RAM. This patch makes
> page_alloc to not call kasan_free_pages() on all new memory.
>
> __free_pages_core() is used when exposing fresh memory during system
> boot and when onlining memory during hotplug. This patch adds a new
> FPI_SKIP_KASAN_POISON flag and passes it to __free_pages_ok() through
> free_pages_prepare() from __free_pages_core().
>
> This has little impact on KASAN memory tracking.
>
> Assuming that there are no references to newly exposed pages before they
> are ever allocated, there won't be any intended (but buggy) accesses to
> that memory that KASAN would normally detect.
>
> However, with this patch, KASAN stops detecting wild and large
> out-of-bounds accesses that happen to land on a fresh memory page that
> was never allocated. This is taken as an acceptable trade-off.
>
> All memory allocated normally when the boot is over keeps getting
> poisoned as usual.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>
> Change-Id: Iae6b1e4bb8216955ffc14af255a7eaaa6f35324d
Not sure this is the right thing to do, see
https://lkml.kernel.org/r/bcf8925d-0949-3fe1-baa8-cc536c529860@oracle.com
Reversing the order in which memory gets allocated + used during boot
(in a patch by me) might have revealed an invalid memory access during boot.
I suspect that that issue would no longer get detected with your patch,
as the invalid memory access would simply not get detected. Now, I
cannot prove that :)
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists