linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 05/11] mm, fsdax: Refactor memory-failure handler for dax mapping

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 18 Feb 2021 16:59:56 +0800
From:   Ruan Shiyang <ruansy.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
CC:     <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>, <dm-devel@...hat.com>,
        <darrick.wong@...cle.com>, <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        <david@...morbit.com>, <agk@...hat.com>, <snitzer@...hat.com>,
        <rgoldwyn@...e.de>, <qi.fuli@...itsu.com>, <y-goto@...itsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 05/11] mm, fsdax: Refactor memory-failure handler for
 dax mapping



On 2021/2/18 下午4:32, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 10:56:11AM +0800, Ruan Shiyang wrote:
>> I'd like to confirm one thing...  I have checked all of this patchset by
>> checkpatch.pl and it did not report the overly long line warning.  So, I
>> should still obey the rule of 80 chars one line?
> 
> checkpatch.pl is completely broken, I would not rely on it.
> 
> Here is the quote from the coding style document:
> 
> "The preferred limit on the length of a single line is 80 columns.
> 
> Statements longer than 80 columns should be broken into sensible chunks,
> unless exceeding 80 columns significantly increases readability and does
> not hide information."
> 

OK.  Got it.  Thank you.


--
Ruan Shiyang.
>