linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 1/3] scmi-cpufreq: Remove deferred probe

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210218103539.zkxhqxaivhifmjwj@vireshk-i7>
Date:   Thu, 18 Feb 2021 16:05:39 +0530
From:   Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:     Nicola Mazzucato <nicola.mazzucato@....com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, sudeep.holla@....com, rjw@...ysocki.net,
        vireshk@...nel.org, cristian.marussi@....com,
        morten.rasmussen@....com, chris.redpath@....com,
        ionela.voinescu@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/3] scmi-cpufreq: Remove deferred probe

On 15-02-21, 07:51, Nicola Mazzucato wrote:
> The current implementation of the scmi_cpufreq_init() function returns
> -EPROBE_DEFER when the OPP table is not populated. In practice the
> cpufreq core cannot handle this error code.
> Therefore, fix the return value and clarify the error message.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Nicola Mazzucato <nicola.mazzucato@....com>
> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c | 8 +++++---
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c
> index 491a0a24fb1e..34bf2eb8d465 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c
> @@ -155,9 +155,11 @@ static int scmi_cpufreq_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
>  
>  	nr_opp = dev_pm_opp_get_opp_count(cpu_dev);
>  	if (nr_opp <= 0) {
> -		dev_dbg(cpu_dev, "OPP table is not ready, deferring probe\n");
> -		ret = -EPROBE_DEFER;
> -		goto out_free_opp;

Why change goto label as well ?

> +		dev_err(cpu_dev, "%s: No OPPs for this device: %d\n",
> +			__func__, ret);
> +
> +		ret = -ENODEV;
> +		goto out_free_priv;
>  	}
>  
>  	priv = kzalloc(sizeof(*priv), GFP_KERNEL);
> -- 
> 2.27.0

-- 
viresh