[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20274436-7275-9734-5a07-d6da46b45c5f@marcan.st>
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 23:01:21 +0900
From: Hector Martin <marcan@...can.st>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@...all.nl>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Mohamed Mediouni <mohamed.mediouni@...amail.com>,
Stan Skowronek <stan@...ellium.com>,
Alexander Graf <graf@...zon.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 20/25] tty: serial: samsung_tty: Use
devm_ioremap_resource
On 16/02/2021 03.51, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> Also fix a bug checking the return value, which should use IS_ERR().
>
> No, no, no. We never, never combine fixing bugs with some rework.
> However devm_ioremap() returns NULL so where is the error?
Sorry, this was a commit message mistake. The code is correct and so is
the patch: just the NULL check is correct for the previous variant and
IS_ERR is correct for devm_ioremap_resource. I confused myself while
writing the commit message after the fact.
> Did you test your patches on existing platforms? If not, please mark all
> of them as RFT on next submission, so Greg does not pick them too fast.
I unfortunately don't have any Exynos devices where I could test the
code (I have a couple but no serial connections, and I have no idea if
mailine would run on them). I'll mark v3 as RFT.
--
Hector Martin (marcan@...can.st)
Public Key: https://mrcn.st/pub
Powered by blists - more mailing lists