lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210218144554.GS2858050@casper.infradead.org>
Date:   Thu, 18 Feb 2021 14:45:54 +0000
From:   Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>, Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@...e.de>,
        "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
        Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
        Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>,
        Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@...cle.com>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] hugetlb: fix update_and_free_page contig page struct
 assumption

On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 11:02:52AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Feb 2021 10:49:25 -0800 Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com> wrote:
> > page structs are not guaranteed to be contiguous for gigantic pages.  The
>
> June 2014.  That's a long lurk time for a bug.  I wonder if some later
> commit revealed it.

I would suggest that gigantic pages have not seen much use.  Certainly
performance with Intel CPUs on benchmarks that I've been involved with
showed lower performance with 1GB pages than with 2MB pages until quite
recently.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ