linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] hugetlb: fix update_and_free

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 18 Feb 2021 14:45:54 +0000
From:   Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>, Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@...e.de>,
        "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
        Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
        Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>,
        Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@...cle.com>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] hugetlb: fix update_and_free_page contig page struct
 assumption

On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 11:02:52AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Feb 2021 10:49:25 -0800 Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com> wrote:
> > page structs are not guaranteed to be contiguous for gigantic pages.  The
>
> June 2014.  That's a long lurk time for a bug.  I wonder if some later
> commit revealed it.

I would suggest that gigantic pages have not seen much use.  Certainly
performance with Intel CPUs on benchmarks that I've been involved with
showed lower performance with 1GB pages than with 2MB pages until quite
recently.