[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d911b26e-1f36-13f8-913e-1e3e3b9649cf@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 17:56:05 +0100
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ben Gardon <bgardon@...gle.com>,
Makarand Sonare <makarandsonare@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/14] KVM: x86: Further clarify the logic and comments
for toggling log dirty
On 18/02/21 17:15, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2021, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> On 13/02/21 01:50, Sean Christopherson wrote:
>>>
>>> - * Nothing to do for RO slots or CREATE/MOVE/DELETE of a slot.
>>> - * See comments below.
>>> + * Nothing to do for RO slots (which can't be dirtied and can't be made
>>> + * writable) or CREATE/MOVE/DELETE of a slot. See comments below.
>>> */
>>> if ((change != KVM_MR_FLAGS_ONLY) || (new->flags & KVM_MEM_READONLY))
>>> return;
>>> + /*
>>> + * READONLY and non-flags changes were filtered out above, and the only
>>> + * other flag is LOG_DIRTY_PAGES, i.e. something is wrong if dirty
>>> + * logging isn't being toggled on or off.
>>> + */
>>> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!((old->flags ^ new->flags) & KVM_MEM_LOG_DIRTY_PAGES)))
>>> + return;
>>> +
>>
>> What about readonly -> readwrite changes?
>
> Not allowed without first deleting the memslot. See commit 75d61fbcf563 ("KVM:
> set_memory_region: Disallow changing read-only attribute later"). RW->RO is
> also not supported.
>
> if (!old.npages) {
> change = KVM_MR_CREATE;
> new.dirty_bitmap = NULL;
> memset(&new.arch, 0, sizeof(new.arch));
> } else { /* Modify an existing slot. */
> if ((new.userspace_addr != old.userspace_addr) ||
> (new.npages != old.npages) ||
> ((new.flags ^ old.flags) & KVM_MEM_READONLY))
> return -EINVAL;
>
Right you are, thanks. Then the warning would catch this quick. I
queued 10 and 11 too, and will reply on 12 now that I looked at it more
closely.
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists