linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf report: Remove redundant libbfd checks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YC7Dx9v17Dk33ZY6@kernel.org>
Date:   Thu, 18 Feb 2021 16:45:11 -0300
From:   Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To:     Nicholas Fraser <nfraser@...eweavers.com>
Cc:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
        "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@...hat.com>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>,
        Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
        Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@....com>,
        Tommi Rantala <tommi.t.rantala@...ia.com>,
        Remi Bernon <rbernon@...eweavers.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Ulrich Czekalla <uczekalla@...eweavers.com>,
        Huw Davies <huw@...eweavers.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf report: Remove redundant libbfd checks

Em Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 02:42:17PM -0500, Nicholas Fraser escreveu:
> 
> On 2021-02-18 2:39 p.m., Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > you forgot the:
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Nicholas Fraser <nfraser@...eweavers.com>
> > 
> > I'm adding it, ok?
> 
> Ah yes sorry about that, to be explicit here it is:
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Fraser <nfraser@...eweavers.com>
> 
> > 
> > I'm also addressing Jiri's remark about spaces surrounding |
> > 
> 
> Thanks. I included this fix in my follow-up patch though so
> you might get a conflict.

I'm pushing to tmp.perf/core what I have, I think there are missing
patches and the latest test isn't applying. can you please take a look
and perhaps refresh patches?

I'll start the tests now so that I can move all this to perf/core
proper.

- Arnaldo