linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RESEND] mm, kasan: don't poison boot memory

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 18 Feb 2021 21:24:49 +0100
From:   Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>
To:     Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
        Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>,
        Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
        Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>,
        Peter Collingbourne <pcc@...gle.com>,
        Evgenii Stepanov <eugenis@...gle.com>,
        Branislav Rankov <Branislav.Rankov@....com>,
        Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@....com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        kasan-dev <kasan-dev@...glegroups.com>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
        George Kennedy <george.kennedy@...cle.com>,
        Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad@...nok.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] mm, kasan: don't poison boot memory

On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 11:46 AM Catalin Marinas
<catalin.marinas@....com> wrote:
>
> The approach looks fine to me. If you don't like the trade-off, I think
> you could still leave the kasan poisoning in if CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL.

This won't work, Android enables CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL in GKI as it turns out :)

> Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
>
> Just curious, have you noticed any issue booting a KASAN_SW_TAGS-enabled
> kernel on a system with sufficiently large RAM? Is the boot slow-down
> significant?

When booting KASAN_SW_TAGS in QEMU with 40G there's a noticeable
start-up delay compared to 2G, but it doesn't seem to be caused by
this memblock->page_alloc poisoning, as removing it makes no
noticeable difference.

I also don't see a noticeable "hang" when booting KASAN_SW_TAGS in
FVP, compared to the one I see with KASAN_HW_TAGS. But I do see a
"hang" in QEMU when going from 2G to 40G with KASAN_HW_TAGS.

It seems that doing STG is much more expensive than writing to the
shadow memory.

> For MTE, we could look at optimising the poisoning code for page size to
> use STGM or DC GZVA but I don't think we can make it unnoticeable for
> large systems (especially with DC GZVA, that's like zeroing the whole
> RAM at boot).

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=211817