[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210219080027.GA12434@amd>
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2021 09:00:27 +0100
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Ondrej Zary <linux@...y.sk>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jari Ruusu <jariruusu@...rs.sourceforge.net>,
Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>,
Scott Branden <scott.branden@...adcom.com>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
BCM Kernel Feedback <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>
Subject: Re: 5.10 LTS Kernel: 2 or 6 years?
Hi!
> > > > For me
> > > > only way to get properly working WiFi on my laptop computer is to
> > > > compile that Intel out-of-tree version. Sad, but true.
> > >
> > > Why use 4.19.y on a laptop in the firstplace? That feels very wrong and
> > > is not the recommended thing to use the LTS kernels for.
> >
> > Well, that's actually what distributions are doing, for example Debian
> > 10.8 is on 4.19...
>
> There's 5.10 in buster-backports. That's probably the easiest way to get support for new HW.
>
I can compile my own kernel, too. But if you go up the thread, it is
about iwlwifi becoming broken in 4.19, and Greg saying it is wrong
to put -stable on laptop. And -stable on laptop is norm, not the
exception.
Pavel
--
http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (182 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists