[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210219081755.eucq4srbam6wg2gm@linutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2021 09:17:55 +0100
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, RCU <rcu@...r.kernel.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Daniel Axtens <dja@...ens.net>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@...eaurora.org>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
"Theodore Y . Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
Oleksiy Avramchenko <oleksiy.avramchenko@...ymobile.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kprobes: Fix to delay the kprobes jump optimization
On 2021-02-18 07:15:54 [-0800], Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> Thank you, but the original report of a problem was from Sebastian
> and the connection to softirq was Uladzislau. So could you please
> add these before (or even in place of) my Reported-by?
>
> Reported-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
> Reported-by: Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@...il.com>
>
> Other than that, looks good!
Perfect. I'm kind of lost here, nevertheless ;) Does this mean that the
RCU selftest can now be delayed?
> Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
>
> Thanx, Paul
Sebastian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists