linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm: Make alloc_contig

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 19 Feb 2021 12:24:54 +0100
From:   Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
To:     Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
        Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm: Make alloc_contig_range handle free hugetlb pages

On Fri 19-02-21 12:17:11, Oscar Salvador wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 11:55:00AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > It is not the lock that I care about but more about counters. The
> > intention was that there is a single place to handle both enqueing and
> > dequeing. As not all places require counters to be updated. E.g. the
> > migration which just replaces one page by another.
> 
> I see.
> alloc_fresh_huge_page->prep_new_huge_page increments h->nr_huge_pages{_node}
> counters.
> Which means:
> 
> >       new_page = alloc_fresh_huge_page();
> >       if (!new_page)
> >               goto fail;
> >       spin_lock(hugetlb_lock);
> >       if (!PageHuge(old_page)) {
> >               /* freed from under us, nothing to do */ 
> >               __update_and_free_page(new_page);
> 
> Here we need update_and_free_page, otherwise we would be leaving a stale value
> in h->nr_huge_pages{_node}. 
> 
> >               goto unlock;
> >       }
> >       list_del(&old_page->lru);
> >       __update_and_free_page(old_page);
> 
> Same here.
> 
> >       __enqueue_huge_page(new_page);
> 
> This is ok since h->free_huge_pages{_node} do not need to be updated.

Fair enough. I didn't get to think this through obviously, but you
should get the idea ;)
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs