lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <DB8P190MB063470370E6CD67900726B5DD9849@DB8P190MB0634.EURP190.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Date:   Fri, 19 Feb 2021 14:09:03 +0000
From:   Sven Schuchmann <schuchmann@...leissheimer.de>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
CC:     Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>,
        "linux-leds@...r.kernel.org" <linux-leds@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: AW: [PATCH v2 2/4] leds: lp50xx: add setting of default intensity
 from DT

Hello Andy,

> Von: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> Gesendet: Freitag, 19. Februar 2021 14:56
> An: Sven Schuchmann <schuchmann@...leissheimer.de>
> Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>; Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>; linux-leds@...r.kernel.org;
> linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Betreff: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] leds: lp50xx: add setting of default intensity from DT
> 
> > > > > Can you or Dan submit patch getting the regulator support to work? If
> > > > > not, I guess we should remove the regulator support after all.
> > > >
> > > > To be true I am fairly new to the kernel and have no idea
> > > > how to test this. So no, I don't want provide a patch (except
> > > > for removing), sorry.
> > >
> > > No problem. It seems Andy submitted series for this.
> > >
> >
> > To me it seems that patches from Andy don't make
> > the regulator work. Maybe I am wrong?
> 
> I;m not sure I understand this correctly. Do you mean that my patches broke
> something? Which one explicitly and what is broken?

No, your patches do not break something (as far as I can see).
Pavel asked for a patch to fix the regulator. The regulator
at this time is only initialized but never used in the lp50xx.
I told him (see above) that I cannot provide a patch which
fixes this. He answered that you fixed this in your series,
but to me it doesn't seem so.
or did you fix the regulator usage in your patch series?

Best Regards,

   Sven 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ