[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YDANkjYEMJtt9SGu@google.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2021 11:12:18 -0800
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To: "Life is hard, and then you die" <ronald@...ovation.ch>
Cc: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
Sergiu Cuciurean <sergiu.cuciurean@...log.com>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Input: applespi: Don't wait for responses to
commands indefinitely.
On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 12:45:51PM -0800, Life is hard, and then you die wrote:
>
> Hi Dmitry,
>
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 12:23:23PM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 11:07:16AM -0800, Ronald Tschalär wrote:
> > > @@ -869,7 +878,7 @@ static int applespi_send_cmd_msg(struct applespi_data *applespi)
> > > return sts;
> > > }
> > >
> > > - applespi->cmd_msg_queued = true;
> > > + applespi->cmd_msg_queued = ktime_get();
> >
> > Will it be OK if I change this to ktime_get_coarse()? I do not think we
> > need exact time here, and the coarse variant is cheaper I believe.
>
> Certainly - I just wasn't aware of the coarse variant.
Applied, thank you.
--
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists