linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 5/9] cxl/mem: Add a "RAW" send command

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YDBf/QD8LMFi6JbH@Konrads-MacBook-Pro.local>
Date:   Fri, 19 Feb 2021 20:03:57 -0500
From:   Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
To:     Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@...el.com>
Cc:     linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org,
        linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>,
        Chris Browy <cbrowy@...ry-design.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
        Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>,
        Jon Masters <jcm@...masters.org>,
        Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
        Rafael Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>,
        "John Groves (jgroves)" <jgroves@...ron.com>,
        "Kelley, Sean V" <sean.v.kelley@...el.com>,
        Ariel Sibley <Ariel.Sibley@...rochip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 5/9] cxl/mem: Add a "RAW" send command

On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 08:09:54PM -0800, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> The CXL memory device send interface will have a number of supported
> commands. The raw command is not such a command. Raw commands allow
> userspace to send a specified opcode to the underlying hardware and
> bypass all driver checks on the command. The primary use for this
> command is to [begrudgingly] allow undocumented vendor specific hardware
> commands.
> 
> While not the main motivation, it also allows prototyping new hardware
> commands without a driver patch and rebuild.
> 
> While this all sounds very powerful it comes with a couple of caveats:
> 1. Bug reports using raw commands will not get the same level of
>    attention as bug reports using supported commands (via taint).
> 2. Supported commands will be rejected by the RAW command.
> 
> With this comes new debugfs knob to allow full access to your toes with
> your weapon of choice.
> 
> Cc: Ariel Sibley <Ariel.Sibley@...rochip.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@...el.com>
> Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com> (v2)
> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
Reviewed-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>