linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] iio: core,buffer-dma: 2 fixes for the recent IIO buffer series

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 21 Feb 2021 11:55:35 +0000
From:   Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To:     Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@...log.com>
Cc:     <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
        <lars@...afoo.de>, <Michael.Hennerich@...log.com>,
        <nuno.sa@...log.com>, <dragos.bogdan@...log.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] iio: core,buffer-dma: 2 fixes for the recent IIO
 buffer series

On Fri, 19 Feb 2021 10:58:24 +0200
Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@...log.com> wrote:

> Patchset contains 2 fixes for some patches that are present in the
> iio/testing branch.
> 
> No idea what's best now, either to re-send the series or to just send these
> fixes on their own.
> For now I chose to send the fixes on their (due to lack of time).
> 
> These could be squashed into the original.
>
That is the approach I've taken.

Tidier to do it this way as I'd not yet pushed the tree out other than as
testing.

Thanks,

Jonathan
 
> I can also re-send the series, but not from an Analog email; since I will
> not have access to it.
> 
> Alexandru Ardelean (2):
>   iio: core: use kfree_const in iio_free_chan_devattr_list() to free
>     names
>   iio: buffer-dma: fix type of 'i' in iio_dma_buffer_alloc_blocks()
> 
>  drivers/iio/buffer/industrialio-buffer-dma.c | 3 +--
>  drivers/iio/industrialio-core.c              | 2 +-
>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>