linux-kernel - Re: NFS Caching broken in 4.19.37

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210221143712.GA15975@fieldses.org>
Date:   Sun, 21 Feb 2021 09:37:12 -0500
From:   Bruce Fields <bfields@...ldses.org>
To:     Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@...bridgegreys.com>
Cc:     Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@...ian.org>,
        Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "940821@...s.debian.org" <940821@...s.debian.org>,
        Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>,
        trond.myklebust@...merspace.com, anna.schumaker@...app.com
Subject: Re: NFS Caching broken in 4.19.37

On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 11:38:51AM +0000, Anton Ivanov wrote:
> On 21/02/2021 09:13, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> >On Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 08:16:26PM +0000, Chuck Lever wrote:
> >>Confirming you are varying client-side kernels. Should the Linux
> >>NFS client maintainers be Cc'd?
> >
> >Ok, agreed. Let's add them as well. NFS client maintainers any ideas
> >on how to trackle this?
> 
> This is not observed with Debian backports 5.10 package
> 
> uname -a
> Linux madding 5.10.0-0.bpo.3-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 5.10.13-1~bpo10+1
> (2021-02-11) x86_64 GNU/Linux

I'm still unclear: when you say you tested a certain kernel: are you
varying the client-side kernel version, or the server side, or both at
once?

--b.