linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] kconfig: Ask user if string needs to be changed when dependency changed

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAK7LNAR-WLk+y01CB7Jjx8VVw4v_qNkdiSGDNkpqvWdTu1L1jg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sun, 21 Feb 2021 23:45:26 +0900
From:   Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>
To:     Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ikod.net>
Cc:     Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>,
        James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
        "Serge E . Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
        Nicolas Iooss <nicolas.iooss@....org>,
        Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-security-module <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
        Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ux.microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] kconfig: Ask user if string needs to be changed
 when dependency changed

On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 8:09 PM Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ikod.net> wrote:
>
>
> On 21/02/2021 09:47, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 3:14 AM Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ikod.net> wrote:
> >>
> >> From: Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ux.microsoft.com>
> >>
> >> Content of string configuration may depend on related kernel
> >> configurations.  Modify oldconfig and syncconfig to inform users about
> >> possible required configuration update and give them the opportunity to
> >> update it:
> >> * if dependencies of this string has changed (e.g. enabled or disabled),
> >> * and if the current value of this string is different than the (new)
> >>   default one.
> >>
> >> This is particularly relevant for CONFIG_LSM which contains a list of
> >> LSMs enabled at boot, but users will not have a chance to update this
> >> list with a make oldconfig.
> >
> > If CONFIG_LSM already exists in the .config,
> > oldconfig does not show a prompt.
> > This is the expected behavior.
>
> It is not the behavior wished for LSM stacking.

Because LSM is doing wrong.


> >
> > You are trying to fix your problem in a wrong way.
> > NACK.
>
> What do you suggest to ensure that users will be asked to update the
> CONFIG_LSM string if they add or remove an LSM?


Fix it in the security subsystem.


Hint:
See 050e9baa9dc9fbd9ce2b27f0056990fc9e0a08a0

-- 
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada