linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 3/7] Reimplement RLIMIT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <72214339-57fc-e47f-bb57-d1b39c69e38e@kernel.dk>
Date:   Sun, 21 Feb 2021 16:38:10 -0700
From:   Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To:     Alexey Gladkov <gladkov.alexey@...il.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, io-uring@...r.kernel.org,
        Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>,
        Linux Containers <containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
        linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc:     Alexey Gladkov <legion@...nel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>,
        "Eric W . Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
        Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/7] Reimplement RLIMIT_NPROC on top of ucounts

On 2/15/21 5:41 AM, Alexey Gladkov wrote:
> diff --git a/fs/io-wq.c b/fs/io-wq.c
> index a564f36e260c..5b6940c90c61 100644
> --- a/fs/io-wq.c
> +++ b/fs/io-wq.c
> @@ -1090,10 +1091,7 @@ struct io_wq *io_wq_create(unsigned bounded, struct io_wq_data *data)
>  		wqe->node = alloc_node;
>  		wqe->acct[IO_WQ_ACCT_BOUND].max_workers = bounded;
>  		atomic_set(&wqe->acct[IO_WQ_ACCT_BOUND].nr_running, 0);
> -		if (wq->user) {
> -			wqe->acct[IO_WQ_ACCT_UNBOUND].max_workers =
> -					task_rlimit(current, RLIMIT_NPROC);
> -		}
> +		wqe->acct[IO_WQ_ACCT_UNBOUND].max_workers = task_rlimit(current, RLIMIT_NPROC);

This doesn't look like an equivalent transformation. But that may be
moot if we merge the io_uring-worker.v3 series, as then you would not
have to touch io-wq at all.

-- 
Jens Axboe