linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.11 00/12] 5.11.1-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+G9fYvky9VTyPeOqnDBsNzP_to-+uCisCpLTiUoJTCUtsPvfg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 23 Feb 2021 01:10:19 +0530
From:   Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, patches@...nelci.org,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
        linux-stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>, pavel@...x.de,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.11 00/12] 5.11.1-rc1 review

On Mon, 22 Feb 2021 at 17:43, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.11.1 release.
> There are 12 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 24 Feb 2021 12:07:46 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.11.1-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.11.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>

Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.

Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>

NOTE:
1) We (LKFT) have upgraded clang-10 to clang-12 builds and following
three new configs enabled.
CONFIG_CC_HAS_ASM_GOTO_OUTPUT=y
CONFIG_CC_HAS_ASM_INLINE=y
CONFIG_HAVE_KCSAN_COMPILER=y

2) on qemu_x86_64_clang-12 a large number of LTP tests reported failures
on stable-rc 5.4, 5.10, 5.11 and Linux mainline.
reported link,
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CA+G9fYuE4ELVDju=LESHnphL4Z2DT5YQjdh9rNgr5D1x5gZxgg@mail.gmail.com/

Summary
------------------------------------------------------------------------

kernel: 5.11.1-rc1
git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
git branch: linux-5.11.y
git commit: 6380656c9227c27a989f750aa7a0c81039d28607
git describe: v5.11-13-g6380656c9227
Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.11.y/build/v5.11-13-g6380656c9227

No regressions (compared to build v5.11)

No fixes (compared to build v5.11)

Ran 52054 total tests in the following environments and test suites.

Environments
--------------
- arc
- arm
- arm64
- dragonboard-410c
- dragonboard-845c
- hi6220-hikey
- i386
- juno-64k_page_size
- juno-r2
- juno-r2-compat
- juno-r2-kasan
- mips
- nxp-ls2088
- nxp-ls2088-64k_page_size
- parisc
- powerpc
- qemu-arm-clang
- qemu-arm64-clang
- qemu-arm64-kasan
- qemu-x86_64-clang
- qemu-x86_64-kasan
- qemu-x86_64-kcsan
- qemu_arm
- qemu_arm64
- qemu_arm64-compat
- qemu_i386
- qemu_x86_64
- qemu_x86_64-compat
- riscv
- s390
- sh
- sparc
- x15
- x86
- x86-kasan
- x86_64

Test Suites
-----------
* build
* linux-log-parser
* install-android-platform-tools-r2600
* kselftest-android
* kselftest-bpf
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-lkdtm
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-splice
* kselftest-static_keys
* kselftest-sync
* kselftest-sysctl
* ltp-cap_bounds-tests
* ltp-commands-tests
* ltp-containers-tests
* ltp-cpuhotplug-tests
* ltp-crypto-tests
* ltp-dio-tests
* ltp-fs-tests
* ltp-hugetlb-tests
* ltp-io-tests
* ltp-math-tests
* ltp-mm-tests
* ltp-nptl-tests
* ltp-pty-tests
* ltp-securebits-tests
* ltp-tracing-tests
* perf
* kvm-unit-tests
* libhugetlbfs
* ltp-controllers-tests
* ltp-cve-tests
* ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests
* ltp-filecaps-tests
* ltp-fs_bind-tests
* ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests
* ltp-fsx-tests
* ltp-ipc-tests
* ltp-sched-tests
* fwts
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-livepatch
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-netfilter
* kselftest-nsfs
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timens
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user
* kselftest-zram
* ltp-syscalls-tests
* network-basic-tests
* v4l2-compliance
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-ir
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kexec
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-lib
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-memory-hotplug
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mount
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-pid_namespace
* kselftest-pidfd
* kselftest-proc
* kselftest-pstore
* kselftest-vm
* kselftest-x86
* ltp-open-posix-tests
* rcutorture
* kunit

-- 
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org