lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6169cb21-538b-1066-51cb-dd362f811fa1@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 22 Feb 2021 13:00:01 -0800
From:   Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To:     Álvaro Fernández Rojas <noltari@...il.com>,
        jonas.gorski@...il.com, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
        bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] irqchip/bcm-6345-l1: fix SMP support



On 2/22/2021 12:13 PM, Álvaro Fernández Rojas wrote:
> Some BCM6358 devices start with Core #1 instead of Core #0.
> Apart from that, SMP is restricted to 1 CPU since BCM6358 has a shared TLB,
> which makes it impossible for the current SMP support to start both CPUs.
> 
> The problem is that smp_processor_id() returns 0 and then cpu_logical_map()
> converts that to 1, which accesses an uninitialized position of intc->cpus[],
> resulting in a kernel panic.

Sounds like you nee to correct the way the cpu_logical_map[] is
populated then?
-- 
Florian

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ