[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210223104950.1f754320@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2021 10:49:50 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>
Cc: Alexander Lobakin <alobakin@...me>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kspp tree with the mips tree
Hi all,
On Mon, 15 Feb 2021 07:47:26 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 18 Jan 2021 15:08:04 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> >
> > Today's linux-next merge of the kspp tree got a conflict in:
> >
> > include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h
> >
> > between commits:
> >
> > 9a427556fb8e ("vmlinux.lds.hf41b233de0ae: catch compound literals into data and BSS")
> > f41b233de0ae ("vmlinux.lds.h: catch UBSAN's "unnamed data" into data")
> >
> > from the mips tree and commit:
> >
> > dc5723b02e52 ("kbuild: add support for Clang LTO")
> >
> > from the kspp tree.
> >
> > I fixed it up (9a427556fb8e and dc5723b02e52 made the same change to
> > DATA_MAIN, which conflicted with the change in f41b233de0ae) and can
> > carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is
> > concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your
> > upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging. You may
> > also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the
> > conflicting tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.
>
> With the merge window about to open, this is a reminder that this
> conflict still exists.
This is now a conflict between the kspp tree and Linus' tree.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists