[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YDMDj8+qm+8pfbyV@pendragon.ideasonboard.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2021 03:06:23 +0200
From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
To: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+renesas@...ndi.org>
Cc: kieran.bingham+renesas@...asonboard.com,
niklas.soderlund+renesas@...natech.se, geert@...ux-m68k.org,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/16] media: i2c: rdacm20: Report camera module name
Hi Jacopo,
Thank you for the patch.
On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 06:41:34PM +0100, Jacopo Mondi wrote:
> When the device is identified the driver currently reports the
> names of the chips embedded in the camera module.
>
> Report the name of the camera module itself instead.
> Cosmetic change only.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+renesas@...ndi.org>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
> ---
> drivers/media/i2c/rdacm20.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/rdacm20.c b/drivers/media/i2c/rdacm20.c
> index 6504ed0bd3bc..56406d82b5ac 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/i2c/rdacm20.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/rdacm20.c
> @@ -532,7 +532,7 @@ static int rdacm20_initialize(struct rdacm20_device *dev)
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> - dev_info(dev->dev, "Identified MAX9271 + OV10635 device\n");
> + dev_info(dev->dev, "Identified RDACM20 camera module\n");
>
> /*
> * Set reverse channel high threshold to increase noise immunity.
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
Powered by blists - more mailing lists