[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210222110956.3rwm2zm2ntctayci@steredhat>
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2021 12:09:56 +0100
From: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
To: Arseny Krasnov <arseny.krasnov@...persky.com>
Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Jorgen Hansen <jhansen@...are.com>,
Norbert Slusarek <nslusarek@....net>,
Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
Andra Paraschiv <andraprs@...zon.com>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org"
<virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"stsp2@...dex.ru" <stsp2@...dex.ru>,
"oxffffaa@...il.com" <oxffffaa@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v5 01/19] af_vsock: update functions for connectible
socket
On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 01:58:11PM +0300, Arseny Krasnov wrote:
>
>On 22.02.2021 13:50, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 08:36:03AM +0300, Arseny Krasnov wrote:
>>> This prepares af_vsock.c for SEQPACKET support: some functions such
>>> as setsockopt(), getsockopt(), connect(), recvmsg(), sendmsg() are
>>> shared between both types of sockets, so rename them in general
>>> manner.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Arseny Krasnov <arseny.krasnov@...persky.com>
>>> ---
>>> net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c | 64 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
>>> 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
>> IIRC I had already given my R-b to this patch. Please carry it over when
>> you post a new version.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Stefano
>Ack, sorry, didn't know that
Don't worry :-)
It is documented here: Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst
Both Tested-by and Reviewed-by tags, once received on mailing list from tester
or reviewer, should be added by author to the applicable patches when sending
next versions. However if the patch has changed substantially in following
version, these tags might not be applicable anymore and thus should be removed.
Usually removal of someone's Tested-by or Reviewed-by tags should be mentioned
in the patch changelog (after the '---' separator).
Thanks,
Stefano
Powered by blists - more mailing lists